Umberto Eco’s Version of the New Testament Story
Tuesday, October 17th, 2006Umberto Eco is a master of wit and wisdom. In his book Foucault’s Pendulum, he craftily tells a story about how the New Testament could have been written. I found it quite amusing. Here, the main character Casaubon is talking to his girlfriend Amparo:
“Now that you mention it, let’s see. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are a bunch of practical jokers who meet somewhere and decide to have a contest. They invent a character, agree on a few basic facts, and then each one’s free to take it and run with it. At the end, they’ll see who’s done the best job. The four stories are picked up by some friends who act as critics: Matthew is fairly realistic, but inists on that Messiah business too much; Mark isn’t bad, just a little sloppy; Luke is elegant, no denying that; and John takes the philosophy a little too far. Actually though, the books have an appeal, they circulate, and when the four realize what’s happening it’s too late. Paul has already met Jesus on the road to Damascus, Pliny begins his investigation ordered by the worried emperor, and a legion of apocryphal writers pretends also to know plenty…. Toi, apocryphe lecteur, mon semblable, mon frere. It all goes to Peter’s head; he takes himself seriously. John threatens to tell the truth, Peter and Paul have him chained up on the island of Patmos. Soon the poor man is seeing things: Help, there are locusts all over my bed, make those trumpets stop, where’s all this blood coming from? The others say he’s drunk, or maybe it’s arteriosclerosis…. Who knows, maybe it all really happened that way.”
Now that’s just classy! Sometimes I wish I could be a writer…